Main content



Loading wiki pages...

Wiki Version:
In this talk I argue that the difference in interpretation between disjunctive polar questions (PolQs), alternative questions (AltQs) and open disjunctive questions (OpenQs) can be derived via effects of focus marking. This proposal brings out the striking parallel between the prosody of questions with contrastive topics and that of OpenQs and AltQs, and, unlike previous approaches, does not rely on structural differences between AltQs/OpenQs and PolQs. To show how this works out, an account of focus and contrastive topic marking in questions is put forward in which f-marking in questions determines what constitutes a possible answer by signaling what the speaker’s QUD is like. By imposing a congruence condition between f-marked questions and their answers that says that answers not only have to resolve the question, but also the signaled QUD, we predict the right answerhood conditions for AltQs, OpenQs and PolQs.
OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.