Main content
Evaluation of text-level measures of lexical dispersion
Date created: | Last Updated:
: DOI | ARK
Creating DOI. Please wait...
Category: Project
Description: This OSF project is associated with a study that evaluates the robustness of various dispersion measures. It builds on recent methodological work, which has argued that dispersion should be measured across linguistically meaningful units such as the text files constituting a corpus. This shift to texts as the unit of analysis raises new methodological issues, however. This paper sheds light on the robustness of different measures, i.e. whether they are (overly) sensitive to data situations that can arise when texts differ (considerably) in length. We identify weak spots in existing measures, and then propose modifications to DP- and DA-related indexes to effect more resistant estimators. Along with other measures, these are then evaluated using data drawn from the BNC. We observe that our modified variants perform at least as well as their original versions. We also find that Carroll’s D2 shows the same weakness as Juilland’s D, a noticeable sensitivity to the number of units that enter the analysis.
The manuscript is available as a preprint on PsyArXiv (https://psyarxiv.com/h9mvs/):
- Sönning, Lukas. (in review). Evaluation of text-level measures of lexical dispersion: Robustness and consistency. PsyArXiv preprint.
Here is the abstract:
- The traditional approach to measuring lexical dispersion is to form corpus parts of equal size and then compare the occurrence rate of an item across these u…
Files
Files can now be accessed and managed under the Files tab.
Citation
Recent Activity
Unable to retrieve logs at this time. Please refresh the page or contact support@osf.io if the problem persists.