Main content
Advisor choice /
Experiment 2 JavaScript
Date created: | Last Updated:
: DOI | ARK
Creating DOI. Please wait...
Category: Project
Description: Online study
Citation
Components
2 Metacognition
Data from advisors with ineffective manipulation (ostensibly confidence-contingent agreement). Advisors not differentiated in the forced-choice block.
2b Metacognition
Data from advisors with ineffective manipulation (ostensibly confidence-contingent agreement). Advisors gave correct response when 'agreeing' rather t...
2c Metacognition
Data look good, subject to full analysis.
3 Accuracy
Advisors differ in accuracy. Data collected while experiment had a bug whereby agreement rates were calculated as accuracy rates.
3b Accuracy
Advisors differ in accuracy. Data collected with bug where advisors give correct answer when they should agree
3c Accuracy
Advisors differ in accuracy. Data used in checking staircase calibration. Participant accuracy too high around 74%
3d Accuracy
Testing whether adding 60 plain practice trials has allowed the staircase to converge on the desired 71% accuracy. It has not.
3e Accuracy
Accuracy data finally looks good. Subjected to full analysis.
4 Agreement
Advisors differ in agreement rates while controlling for overall accuracy.
6 Agreement vs accuracy
High agreement vs high accuracy advisors. Simultaneous advisor presentation during familiarization.
6b Agreement vs accuracy
High agreement vs high accuracy advisors. Advisors presented 1/block in familiarisation phase.
Recent Activity
Start managing your projects on the OSF today.
Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.