Published papers from this dataset: Bar-Anan, Y., & Nosek, B. A. (2014). [A comparative investigation of seven indirect attitude measures][1]. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 668-688. doi 10.3758/s13428-013-0410-6 Bar-Anan, Y., & Vianello, M. (2018). [A multi-method multi-trait test of the dual-attitude perspective][2]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147, 1264-1272. 10.1037/xge0000383 Nosek, B. A., Bar-Anan, Y., Sriram, N., Axt, J. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2014). [Understanding and using the Brief Implicit Association Test: Recommended scoring procedures][3]. PLoS ONE 9(12): e110938. doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0110938 Richetin, J., Costantini, G., Perugini, M., & Schönbrodt, F. (2015). [Should we stop looking for a better scoring algorithm for handling Implicit Association Test data? Test of the role of errors, extreme latencies treatment, scoring formula, and practice trials on reliability and validity][4]. PloS one, 10(6), e0129601. Wolsiefer, K., Westfall, J., & Judd, C. M. (2017). [Modeling stimulus variation in three common implicit attitude tasks][5]. Behavior research methods, 49(4), 1193-1209. [1]: https://osf.io/y9zf2/ [2]: https://psyarxiv.com/bjaq8 [3]: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.011093 [4]: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0129601 [5]: https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13428-016-0779-0