Main content
Algorithmic vs. Human Decision-Making: How does the method of decision-making and the level of communicated fairness influence justice perception? - A higher education perspective
Date created: | Last Updated:
: DOI | ARK
Creating DOI. Please wait...
Category: Project
Description: We will assess the justice perception of university students with respect to an algorithmic versus human decision-making processes regarding the distribution of topics (and presentation dates) in seminars (see Ackigoz et al., 2020; Lee, 2018, for relevant prior studies). The research question is as follows: Do justice perception, trust, and emotional responses of students differ between algorithmic versus human decision-making and does the communicated decisional fairness (information on decisional fairness vs. no information) affect this? The experimental design follows a 2x2 between-subjects design including the factors decision-making agent (human vs. algorithm) and communicated fairness (information on decisional fairness vs. no information). The outcome variables/dependent variables are perceived justice, trust, outrage, and satisfaction. Additionally, we will assess how outcome favourability affects the corresponding relationships.
Files
Files can now be accessed and managed under the Files tab.