Main content

Contributors:

Date created: | Last Updated:

: DOI | ARK

Creating DOI. Please wait...

Create DOI

Category: Data

Description: . Instructions: ------------ 1. Download the data file "probe_data.Rda" or the data file "probe_data_follow_up.Rda". 2. Copy the local path of the data file to 'my_path' variable (line 63); e.g. "~/Downolads/" 3. Select the file to be analyzed by uncommenting the appropriate file name to 'my_datafile' variable (lines 65-66) 4. If you do not have the 'lme4' and 'ggplot2' packages, install it (type to Consule 'install.packages("lme4")' or 'install.packages("ggplot2")'). Data file description: --------------------- In the "probe_data.Rda" file you will find the raw data from the probe phase of ten experiments, and five follow-up sample from Experiments 1-2 and 7-9, described in Salomon et al. (2017). The code analyses the proportion of trials participants chose the Go items over No-GO items using a logistic regression with subject's code as a random effect. The analysis indicate significant proportions in comparison to the null hypothesis of 50% chance level (log-odds = 0). It also computes 95% CI, and plot the results in a forest plot. Data frame variables: -------------------- Variables used in the analysis: "Outcome" - Binary variable indicating whether participant chose the Go item (1) or the NoGo item (0). This is the dependent variable in the logistic regression analysis. "subjectID" - Participant's code, is used as a random effect in the logistic regression analysis. "PairType" - Categorical veriable indicating the type of comparison: 1 - High value: Go vs. NoGo 2 - Low value: Go vs. NoGo 3 - Sanity Go: High value Go vs. low value Go 4 - Sanity NoGo: High value NoGo vs. low value NoGo "PairType2" - Same as PairType variable, only as a character class Results are analyzed separately for each pair type, or with PairType as a fixed effect to estimate differences of Go choices in high versus low value pairs. "PairType3" - for experiments 1-4, ech category's 8x8 pairs were separeted to two pair-types, each of the higher and lower 4x4 pairs. "Experiment" - the experiment number as appearing in Salomon et al. (2017). Each experiment is analyzed separately. "ExperimentName" - description of the experiment's stimuli and cues "ExperimentNameFull" - Useful title for each experiment, ordered accordingly to its number Other recorded variables: "scanner" - Was the experiment conducted in an fMRI settings. All experiments were not. "order" - Used to counter-balance Go signal association during training "block" - full presentation of all probe choices. Each experiment comprised of two blocks. "run" - Each block was split into two runs, for compatibility with fMRI experimental settings. "trial" - trial number "onsettime" - Stimuli onset time "ImageLeft" - The name of the stimulus left of the fixation cross "ImageRight"- The name of the stimulus right of the fixation cross "bidLeft" - The initial value of the stimulus left of the fixation cross (as estimate in a BDM or binary ranking task) "bidRight" - The initial value of the stimulus right of the fixation cross (as estimate in a BDM or binary ranking task) "bidIndexLeft" - The rank-order value of the stimulus left of the fixation cross (range: 1-60) "bidIndexRight" - The rank-order value of the stimulus right of the fixation cross (range: 1-60) "IsleftGo" - Binary variable indicating if the left stimulus is Go (1) or No-Go (0). In sanity choices, high value items are indicated similarly to Go items. "Response" - participant's choice: "u" - left item, "i" for right items, "x" if subject did not responde on time (RT>1500 ms). When subject responded by choosing the Go item (i.e. IsleftGo==1 & Response=="u", IsleftGo==0 & Response=="i"), the resulting Outcome will be (1). "RT" - reaction time. Version notes, September 18th 2017: This section has been modified in accordance with the latest version of the manuscript: Experiment 1, which was reported as pilot experiment in previous versions of the manuscript, was included in the main analysis codes; experiments were reordered throughout the manuscript and R codes; codes to recreate the plots were added.

Files

Files can now be accessed and managed under the Files tab.

Citation

Recent Activity

Loading logs...

OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.