Infections and Elections: Did an Ebola Outbreak Influence the 2014 U.S. Federal Elections (And if so, How)?


Date created: | Last Updated:


Creating DOI. Please wait...

Create DOI

Category: Project

Description: Longitudinal analyses of pre-election polling data tested whether (and how) an Ebola outbreak predicted voting intentions preceding the 2014 U.S. federal elections. Analyses were conducted on nationwide polls pertaining to all House of Representatives elections, and on state-specific polls pertaining to 34 Senate elections. Analyses compared voting intentions expressed before vs. after the initial Ebola outbreak, and assessed correlations between internet search activity and voting intentions. Results revealed (a) the psychological salience of Ebola was associated with increased intention to vote for Republican Party candidates, and (b) this effect occurred primarily within states characterized by norms favoring Republican candidates (the effect was reversed in states with opposing norms). Ancillary analyses addressed several interpretational issues. Overall, these results suggest that disease outbreaks may influence voter behavior in two psychologically distinct ways: Increased inclination to vote for politically conservative candidates, and increased inclination to conform to popular opinion.


Loading files...


Recent Activity

Loading logs...

OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.