Main content

Home

Menu

Loading wiki pages...

View
Wiki Version:
# Impact of analytical impact information ## Studies for Bergh and Reinstein, 2020, SPPS ["Empathic and Numerate Giving: The Joint Effects of Victim Images and Charity Evaluation", SPPS, 2020](https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/handle/10871/39550) Paper, code, data, survey materials maintained [in the GitHub repo dual_process_spps](https://github.com/daaronr/dual_process_spps) ### Effectiveness information and Joint evaluation Note: Better formatted version of pre-registration [as a pdf here](https://github.com/daaronr/dual_process_spps/blob/master/prereg-as-pdf-exp-6/Aspredicted%20dual%20proc%20separate%20decisions-DR%20commenting.pdf) - Study tied to Essex 2019 Omnibus survey (see registration; note these are the later/non-British-nationality participants in the study registered in the 'substitution in charitable giving' OSF page). - Participants have the opportunity to commit to donate any amount of their potential earnings from a potential £50 lottery prize (similar to Kellner et al, 2018) - We vary the presentation (2x2, blocked randomisation) of: - Choice arm: two charities (Against Malaria Foundation and Guide Dogs for the Blind), or only one charity (AMF); participants can donate to (at most) one of these - Analytic information about the 'cost per life saved' (AMF) and 'cost per guide dog' (GD) To view the key screens: [Copy of site](https://essex.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_efCWziL56Ao0rdP) - Type in “nonuk” in the first box to get to the relevant part (edited) There are 4 treatments; if you re-start 4 times you should see each of them. - Context: The donation question will occur at the end of a series of survey questions ### Experiments 1-5 run by Robin Bergh Described in paper, see supplementary appendix. ## Reinstein and Harms: Preliminary study on the impact of rating and ranking Discussed at [giving for impact](http://www.givingforimpact.com/?p=234) ## Cross-referenced project and registration: "Field experiment: Impact of 'impact per dollar information' on charitable giving in a large email campaign" [LINK](https://osf.io/tnpdz/) Reinstein et al, 2018 OSF Identifier: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/TNPDZ
OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.