The file "The statistical signature of confidence is not necessarily a folded X-pattern.zip" contains the computer code to reproduce analyses and figures in
Rausch, M., & Zehetleitner, M. (2019). The folded X-pattern is not necessarily a statistical signature of decision confidence. PLoS Computational Biology. 15 (10), e1007456.
To reproduce the analysis, download and unpack all data on your local hard drive.
The R scripts begin with setting the path; please insert the path to the folder where ever you have stored the files.
We conducted the analysis on using R 3.3.3 (64-bit) and the R packages ggplot2 2.2.1, and plyr 1.8.4, on a PC running on Windows 10.
All material is licensed under a CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
For a human-readable summary of what you are allowed to do with that piece of work, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Contact: Manuel.rausch(at)ku.de0/
Contact: Manuel.rausch(at)ku.de
Abstract:
Recent studies have traced the neural correlates of confidence in perceptual choices using statistical signatures of confidence. The most widely used statistical signature is the folded X-pattern, which was derived from a standard model of confidence assuming an objective definition of confidence as the posterior probability of making the correct choice given the evidence. The folded X-pattern entails that confidence as the subjective probability of being correct equals the probability 0.75 if the stimulus in neutral about the choice options, increases with discriminability of the stimulus in correct trials, and decreases with discriminability in incorrect trials. Here, we show that the standard model of confidence is a special case in which there is no reliable trial-by-trial evidence about discriminability itself. According to a more general model, if there is enough evidence about discriminability, objective confidence is characterised by different pattern: For both correct and incorrect choices, confidence increases with discriminability. In addition, we demonstrate the consequence if discriminability is varied in discrete steps within the standard model: confidence in choices about neutral stimuli is no longer .75. Overall, identifying neural correlates of confidence by presupposing the folded X-pattern as a statistical signature of confidence is not legitimate.
