Date created: | Last Updated:

Category: Project

Description: Data from the article: From imitation to innovation, this is the effective way for act of creation, and artistic creation is no exception. The intervention of AI has brought great impact and challenges to the creative mode of art. We believe that human decisions are the foundation of science and technology. Therefore, before we talk about whether the work completed by AI is art? We need to make it clear that when we put together the paintings completed by AI and human artists, can the audiences correctly find out which one is completed by human artists? Thus, we can improve “information” and “technology”, and further influence human’s behavior. This study examines how audiences responded to seeing and distinguishing the paintings created by AI and human artists. Results revealed that most audiences can correctly distinguish between paintings made by AI and human artists, and that the accuracy is higher for groups whose use “intuition” as the criterion for judgment. At the same time, the audience prefers the paintings created by human artists. In addition, there are big differences in the perception of the denotation and connotation of paintings between audiences of different backgrounds. The reasons for this will be analyzed in subsequent research.