Main content
Impact of the number of players on the emergence of creative movements in small-sided soccer games: a systematic review and meta-analysis. /
Risk of bias assessment
- Lucas Shoiti Carvalho Ueda
- Paulo Henrique Borges
- Gibson Praça
- Juliano Fernandes da Silva
- Gabriel Silveira Guedes da Maia
- Michel Milistetd
Date created: | Last Updated:
: DOI | ARK
Creating DOI. Please wait...
Category: Uncategorized
Description: The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for analytical cross sectional studies will be used for assessing risk of bias of individual studies. The instrument consists of the following questions: “Were the criteria for inclusion in the sample clearly defined?”; “Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail?”; “Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way?”; “Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition?”; “Were confounding factors identified?”; “Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated?”; “Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way?”; “Was appropriate statistical analysis used?”. To classify the questions they must be flagged as "yes", "no", "unclear" or "not applicable”. (Moola et al., 2020).
Start managing your projects on the OSF today.
Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.