In the general discussion we included the following note: "This replication presented us with a special challenge, regarding some of the events ‎included in the original stimuli of Fischhoff (1975). Events C and D used in the original were ‎from a classic clinical psychology book by Ellis from the 1960s. The original authors reflected ‎on the use of these stimuli and noted that the scenarios described patients "in terms that fit ‎now–antiquated mores and theories" (p. 11; Fischhoff, 2007; also see interview in Klein, ‎Hegarty, & Fischhoff, 2017). In correspondence with the original author and the editor we felt ‎it needed to include a warning note that that these stimuli should no longer be used in follow-up ‎research. We removed the reporting of these materials and analyses of these events from the ‎manuscript and the supplementary." . And in the supplementary: "We noted in the general discussion the challenge regarding the use of Events C and D from Fischhoff (1975) ‎and concluded that "In correspondence with the original author and the editor we felt it needed to include ‎a warning note that that these stimuli should no longer be used in follow-up research. We removed the ‎reporting of these materials and analyses of these events from the manuscript and the supplementary. ".‎ We note that the stimuli is still included in the frozen pre-registration and the data from these events are ‎still provided on the OSF. We further note that not reporting these in our manuscript is a deviation from ‎the pre-registration, done in consultation with the editor and in correspondence with the original author. ‎We feel this deviation is warranted given the circumstances.‎"