Loading wiki pages...

Wiki Version:
<p>Within-subject designs tend to have higher statistical power and require fewer participants than between-subject designs, but this method presents its own detriments in terms of measurement. Carryover effects, such as practice and fatigue effects, may confound the observed effects in within-subjects designs. The present study aims to remedy these confounds by presenting participants with split-halves of the same psychometric scale, with participants never encountering the same item more than once. We compared two studies which were exactly the same except a scale was randomly split for 1 study. Study 1 had a traditional implementation, whereas Study 2 used split-halves. The effects of split-half implementation were evaluated using measures of scale and item reliability—Cronbach’s Alpha, McDonald’s Omega, individual item discrimination on a latent trait, and predictive ability. We observed that when items were randomized with this method, carryover effects were reduced.</p>
OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.