Main content

Evaluating science: A comparison of human and AI reviewers

  0

Date created: | Last Updated:

: DOI | ARK

Creating DOI. Please wait...

Create DOI

Category: Project

Description: This field study comprises two interrelated parts: First, we compare the reviewer evaluations of researchers' abstracts submitted to a scientific conference with evaluations of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-generated abstracts generated. Second, we compare the evaluations of human reviewers with evaluations of the same abstracts by AI.

License: CC-By Attribution 4.0 International

Files

Citation

Components

Data

Fiedler, Böhm, Shcherbiak & 1 more
Recent Activity

Analysis

Fiedler, Böhm, Shcherbiak & 1 more
Recent Activity

Paper

Fiedler, Böhm, Shcherbiak & 1 more
Recent Activity

Privat Storage

Fiedler, Böhm, Shcherbiak & 1 more
Recent Activity

Material

Fiedler, Böhm, Shcherbiak & 1 more
Recent Activity

Recent Activity

OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.

Copyright © 2011-2024 Center for Open Science | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Status | API
TOP Guidelines | Reproducibility Project: Psychology | Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology