Main content

Evaluating science: A comparison of human and AI reviewers

  0

Date created: | Last Updated:

: DOI | ARK

Creating DOI. Please wait...

Create DOI

Category: Project

Description: This field study comprises two interrelated parts: First, we compare the reviewer evaluations of researchers' abstracts submitted to a scientific conference with evaluations of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-generated abstracts generated. Second, we compare the evaluations of human reviewers with evaluations of the same abstracts by AI.

License: CC-By Attribution 4.0 International

Files

Files can now be accessed and managed under the Files tab.

Citation

Components

Data

Fiedler, Böhm, Shcherbiak & 1 more
Recent Activity

Analysis

Fiedler, Böhm, Shcherbiak & 1 more
Recent Activity

Paper

Fiedler, Böhm, Shcherbiak & 1 more
Recent Activity

Privat Storage

Fiedler, Böhm, Shcherbiak & 1 more
Recent Activity

Material

Fiedler, Böhm, Shcherbiak & 1 more
Recent Activity

Recent Activity

Unable to retrieve logs at this time. Please refresh the page or contact support@osf.io if the problem persists.

OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.

Copyright © 2011-2025 Center for Open Science | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Status | API
TOP Guidelines | Reproducibility Project: Psychology | Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology