Main content
Reducing Implicit Racial Preferences: I. A Comparative Investigation of 17 Interventions
- Calvin K. Lai
- Maddalena Marini
- Steven A. Lehr
- Carlo Cerruti
- Jiyun Elizabeth L. Shin
- Jennifer Joy-Gaba
- Arnold K. Ho
- Bethany Teachman
- Sean Wojcik
- Sena Koleva
- Rebecca S. Frazier
- Larisa Heiphetz
- Eva CHEN
- Rhiannon N. Turner
- Jonathan Haidt
- Selin Kesebir
- Carlee Beth Hawkins
- Hillary Schaefer
- Sandro Rubichi
- Giuseppe Sartori
- Christopher M Dial
- Sriram Natarajan
- Mahzarin R. Banaji
- Brian A. Nosek
Date created: | Last Updated:
: DOI | ARK
Creating DOI. Please wait...
Category: Project
Description: Many methods for reducing implicit prejudice have been identified, but little is known about their relative effectiveness. We held a research contest to experimentally compare interventions for reducing the expression of implicit racial prejudice. Teams submitted seventeen interventions that were tested an average of 3.70 times each in four studies (total N = 17,021), with rules for revising interventions between studies. Eight of seventeen interventions were effective at reducing implicit preferences for Whites compared to Blacks, particularly ones that provided experience with counterstereotypical exemplars, used evaluative conditioning methods, and provided strategies to override biases. The other nine interventions were ineffective, particularly ones that engaged participants with others’ perspectives, asked participants to consider egalitarian values, or induced a positive emotion. The most potent interventions were ones that invoked high self-involvement or linked Black people with positivity and White people with negativity. No intervention consistently reduced explicit racial preferences. Furthermore, intervention effectiveness only weakly extended to implicit preferences for Asians and Hispanics.
Add important information, links, or images here to describe your project.