Snakes, both in the evolutionary past and to date, are associated with danger and threat. Research has shown that snakes are prioritized by our attentional system, despite many of us rarely encountering them in our daily lives. We conducted two high-powered, pre-registered experiments (total N = 224) manipulating target prevalence to better understand prioritization of threatening targets. Target prevalence refers to the proportion of trials wherein a target is presented; reductions in prevalence consistently reduce the likelihood that targets will be found. We reasoned that snake targets in visual search should experience weaker effects of low target prevalence compared to non-threatening targets (rabbits), because they should be prioritized by searchers despite appearing rarely. In both experiments we found evidence of classic prevalence effects but (contrasting prior work) we also found that search for threatening targets was slower and less accurate compared to nonthreatening targets. This surprising result is possibly due to methodological issues common in prior studies, including comparatively smaller sample sizes, fewer trials, and a tendency to exclusively examine conditions of relatively high prevalence. Our findings call into question accounts of threat prioritization, and suggest that prior attention findings may be constrained to a narrow range of circumstances.