Main content
Publication bias and reporting quality of systematic review abstracts presented at five consecutive World Congresses of Pain
- Livia Puljak
- Svjetlana Dosenovic
- Lenko Saric
- Antonia Jelicic Kadic
- Ian J. Saldanha
Date created: | Last Updated:
: DOI | ARK
Creating DOI. Please wait...
Category: Project
Description: The aims of this study were to assess publication rate of SRs presented as abstract on the last five World Congresses on Pain (WCP), to analyze whether there are any discrepancies in methods, results and conclusions between SR conference abstracts and their corresponding full publications, to analyze quality of reporting of SR abstracts presented at those conferences using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for abstracts (PRISMA-A), and finally to assess whether there are any difference in reporting of SR conference abstracts before and after publication of PRISMA-A.
Start managing your projects on the OSF today.
Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.