Main content



Loading wiki pages...

Wiki Version:
Polish is one of the languages which can employ V-stranding ellipsis in answers to polar (*yes/no*) questions (V(erb-echo) answers; see esp. Holmberg 2015, and see Ruda 2014; Mendes 2020; Arregi & Pietraszko 2021 for some (preliminary) discussions of V-stranding in Polish). Having revised evidence that Polish V-stranding in this case results from X[+V]P ellipsis (as opposed to *pro*-drop/argument ellipsis; see esp. Landau 2018, 2020a,b for relevant discussion), including facts related to indefinite, &P, QP, and NPI subjects (see also Mendes 2020 and references therein), I show that the elided projection is much lower in Polish than what is standardly assumed for this type of V-stranding (TP ellipsis; see e.g. Holmberg 2015; Gribanova 2017; McCloskey 2017; Mendes 2020; Sato & Maeda 2020; see also Holmberg 2015; Gribanova 2020; Portelance 2020 for low VP ellipsis analyses). In particular, while determining the category of X[+V]P in V answers in Polish is a challenging problem due to the inadequacy of the standard diagnostics for determining the height of V movement in the language (see Ruda 2014 and references therein), based on arguments from the answering options, I show that in Polish X[+V]P cannot be higher than AspP and based on feature mismatch options, I show that it is lower than AspP and at least in some contexts can be lower than VoiceP. This provides empirical evidence against Landau’s suggestion that the movement of X across a spell-out boundary (i.e. outside the complement of a phase head, e.g., V-to-Voice movement, where Voice is a phase head) bleeds XP ellipsis (e.g. V-stranding VP ellipsis). To this I add a theoretical argument: if ellipsis is a cyclic operation (see Murphy & Müller forthcoming; Sailor 2021), as it needs to be in a phase-based derivation (otherwise the complement of the first phase (e.g. VP) would have undergone morphophonological processing before ellipsis could apply, ellipsis currently conceived of as non-pronunciation licensed by syntax (see Merchant 2001; Aelbrecht 2010; Saab forthcoming a.m.o.)), any V-stranding X[+V]P ellipsis necessarily employs the step which is forbidden in Landau’s system: V needs to move to Voice and this needs to be followed by VP ellipsis (V is stranded, so it escapes the ellipsis site and VP is the complement of a phase head, so its non-pronunciation needs to be licensed before/at its spell-out).
OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.