Worse than Measurement Error: Consequences of Inappropriate Latent Variable Measurement Models

Date created: | Last Updated:


Creating DOI. Please wait...

Create DOI

Category: Project

Description: Previous research and methodological advice has focussed on the importance of accounting for measurement error in psychological data. That perspective assumes that psychological variables conform to a common factor model, such that they consist of construct variance plus error. In this paper, we ask what happens when a set of items that are not generated from a common factor construct model are nonetheless modeled as reflecting a common factor. Through a series of hypothetical examples and a real-data re-analysis, we show that (1) common factor models tend to produce extremely biased and highly variable structural parameter estimates when the population model is not a common factor; (2) model fit is a poor indicator of the degree of bias; and (3) composite models are sometimes more reliable than common factor models under alternative measurement structures, though they also lead to unacceptably bad solutions in some cases.


Loading files...



  • R Code

    R code to reproduce examples, parameter sweeps, Fig 2, and replication/reversal of results from Cole & Preacher (2014)

    Recent Activity

    Loading logs...

  • Paper & Supplementary Material

    Recent Activity

    Loading logs...

Recent Activity

Loading logs...

OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.