Main content
PSA [006] - Moral thinking across the world
- Bence Bago
- Balazs Aczel
- Christopher R. Chartier
- John Protzko
- Alberto Mirisola
- Jessica Martinez
- Halil Emre Kocalar
- Fatih Bayrak
- Onurcan Yilmaz
- Erica D. Musser
- Gilad Feldman
- Mariola Paruzel-Czachura
- Daniel Storage
- Danielle Ochoa
- Gabriela Mariana Marcu
- Miguel A. Vadillo
- Mehrad Moeini-Jazani.
- Carmelo P. Cubillas
- Tripat Gill
- William Jimenez-Leal
- Christoph Schild
- Marton Kovacs
- Kathleen Schmidt
- Hu Chuan-Peng
- Fanny Lalot
- Handan Akkas
- Nathan Nguyen
- Darius-Aurel Frank
- Steve M. J. Janssen
- John Jamir Benzon R. Aruta
- Carmel Levitan
- Danielle Young
- Anna Wlodarczyk
- Mathias Twardawski
- Mirjana Tonkovic
- Anthony Lantian
- Xiaoxiao Zheng
- Evan Thomae
- Neil McLatchie
- Don C. Zhang
- Matus Adamkovic
- Suzanne L. K. Stewart
- Miroslav Sirota
- Anna O. Kuzminska
- Sinem Söylemez
- Liudmila Piatnitckaia
- Vera Cubela Adoric
- Julia Paterlini
- Çağlar Solak
- MEHMET PEKER
- Chris Isloi
- Andrei Dumbravă
- Su Yadanar
- Michael Slipenkyj
- Kevin E. Tiede
- Maja Becker
- Bradley Kennedy
- Fatima zahra SAHLI
Date created: | Last Updated:
: DOI | ARK
Creating DOI. Please wait...
Category: Project
Description: Research on moral reasoning is centered around moral dilemmas in which deontological perspectives (emphasizing individual rights) are in conflict with consequentialist reasoning (also referred to as utilitarian; following the greater good). A central finding of this field is that people in certain situations are more likely do go with deontological considerations, while in other cases they are more likely to decide based on consequentialist reasons. In their seminal article, Greene et al. (2009) tried to investigate the effect of situational and psychological factors (e.g., intent of the agent, or physical contact between the agent and victim) on people’s moral decisions, but their work could not explore the effect of a potentially important component: culture. Therefore, the goal of the present research proposal is to empirically test the universality of utilitarian and deontological responding by directly replicating Greene et al.’s experiments on non-WEIRD samples as well as to explore the influence of culture and economic status on moral reasoning.