**Reviewer Zero Resources** - Reviewer training - [Workshop slides][1] - [Video recording of workshop][2] - Early career researcher resources: Responding to reviews - [Workshop slides: Behavioral study example][3] - [Case study handout : Paper summary and decision letter][4] - [Case study: Responding to problematic reviews][30] - [Video recording of workshop][6] - [Workshop slides: Cognitive Neuroscience example][7] - [Case study handout: Paper summary and decision letter][8] - [Case study: Responding to problematic reviews][31] - [Video recording of workshop][9] - [Toolkit for responding effectively to reviews][5] **Other Resources** - General information on peer review, tips on how to review and cope with reviews - "[The art of peer reviewing: Toward an effective developmental process][10]" - "[Peer review in scientific publications: benefits, critiques, & a survival guide][11]" - "[How to survive peer review][12]" - [Committee on Publication Ethics: Peer review processes][13] - [Toolkit for peer review][14], focused on health research - [PREReview trainings for open, preprint peer review][15] - [Society for Neuroscience peer review mentorship program][16] - [American Psychological Association reviewer resources][17] - [American Psychological Association Inclusive Language Guidelines][18] - [American Speech-Language-Hearing Association reviewer resources and mentorship program][19] - Publisher resources - [Elsevier tools for navigating peer review][20] (including training) - [Taylor & Francis: Guide to becoming a peer reviewer][21] - [Springer Nature: How to peer review][22] - [Springer Nature: Editorial principles and guidance: Content that might be harmful to human population groups][23] - [British Medical Journal: Reviewer training materials][24] - [Web of Science Academy][25] (includes peer review training) - Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology and the Consortium for Advanced Research Methods and Analysis Introductory Reviewer Development Workshop - [Module 1: Integrity, Open-mindedness, and Constructiveness][26] - [Module 2: Thoroughness, Tone, and Clarify][27] - [Module 3: Expertise, Represent, and Efficiency][28] - [American Psychological Association editorial fellowship program][29] [1]: https://osf.io/tn2qk [2]: https://osf.io/9pgjx [3]: https://osf.io/jrk2m [4]: https://osf.io/dg5a4 [5]: https://osf.io/45htp [6]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfPsr62N1AE [7]: https://osf.io/9n4qz [8]: https://osf.io/zt4my [9]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfPsr62N1AE [10]: https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2019.1616657 [11]: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4975196/ [12]: https://www.bmj.com/sites/default/files/attachments/resources/2011/07/wager.pdf [13]: https://publicationethics.org/peerreview [14]: https://www.equator-network.org/toolkits/peer-reviewing-research/ [15]: https://prereview.org/trainings [16]: https://www.jneurosci.org/content/sfn-reviewer-mentor-program [17]: https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/resources/reviewers-resources [18]: https://www.apa.org/about/apa/equity-diversity-inclusion/language-guidelines [19]: https://academy.pubs.asha.org/prep-the-asha-journals-peer-review-excellence-program/ [20]: https://researcheracademy.elsevier.com/navigating-peer-review [21]: https://editorresources.taylorandfrancis.com/reviewer-guidelines/ [22]: https://www.springernature.com/in/authors/campaigns/how-to-peer-review [23]: https://resource-cms.springernature.com/springer-cms/rest/v1/content/20312376/data/Harmful_research [24]: https://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-reviewers/training-materials [25]: https://clarivate.com/web-of-science-academy/ [26]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFEA7VAVh_I [27]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iZke8xIS6h4 [28]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJzP6P3-eyg [29]: https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/resources/call-editorial-fellowships [30]: https://osf.io/wfe6d [31]: https://osf.io/xup42