Scientists’ reputations are based on getting it right, not being right

Affiliated institutions: Center For Open Science, University of Virginia

Date created: | Last Updated:

: DOI | ARK

Creating DOI. Please wait...

Create DOI

Category: Project

Description: This study investigates how individuals evaluate scientists based on the results they produce, their research practices, replications of their work, and how they respond to replication efforts.

Wiki

A manuscript about this project can be found here. A variable codebook for all studies can be found here. Overview This line of research investigates how individuals evaluate scientists based on events during the scientific process with a focus on the consequences that replication results may have for the reputations of the original researchers. This page explains the studies conducted in this li...

Files

Loading files...

Citation

Components

  • Reputation Study 1


    Recent Activity

    Loading logs...

  • Reputation Study 2


    Recent Activity

    Loading logs...

  • Reputation Study 3


    Recent Activity

    Loading logs...

  • Reputation Study 4


    Recent Activity

    Loading logs...

Tags

Recent Activity

Loading logs...

This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.

Create an Account Learn More Hide this message