Making research evaluation more transparent: Aligning research philosophy, institutional values, and reporting

Date created: | Last Updated:

: DOI | ARK

Creating DOI. Please wait...

Create DOI

Category: Project

Description: There is a growing interest in changing the culture of psychology to improve the quality of our science. At the root of this interest is concern over the reproducibility of key findings. A variety of large-scale replication attempts have revealed that a number of previously published effects cannot be reproduced, while other analyses indicate that the published literature is rife with underpowered studies and publication bias. These revelations suggest that it is time to change how psychological science is carried out and increase transparency of reporting. Unfortunately, actual change has been slow, and we argue change will continue to be slow until institutions adopt new procedures for evaluating scholarly activity. We consider two courses of action that individuals and departments can take that we believe will facilitate change throughout psychological science. These two actions are the development of individualized research philosophy statements and the creation of an annotated curriculum vitae to improve the transparency of scholarly reporting. Our recommendations build on proposals for open science by enabling researchers to have a voice in articulating (and contextualizing) how they would like their work to be evaluated and by providing a mechanism for more detailed and transparent reporting of scholarly activities.

This project represents an accepted preprint submitted to PsyArXiv . Learn more about how to work with preprint files. View preprint

Wiki

This project proposes ways of improving transparency of reporting scholarship within the context of an annotated CV and encouraging researchers to augment their research statements to include their research philosophy. The proposed Annotated CV is consistent with the guidelines proposed by within the San Francisco Declaration On Research Assessment (DORA). http://www.ascb.org/dora/

Files

Loading files...

Citation

osf.io/cnb82

Components

  • Making research evaluation more transparent: Aligning research philosophy, departmental values, and reporting

    Describes two steps for implementing policies to align research practices with institutional values and reporting mechanisms

    Recent Activity

    Loading logs...

Tags

Recent Activity

Loading logs...

×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.

Create an Account Learn More Hide this message