Main content

Home

Menu

View
Wiki Version:
Dynamic theories of anaphora standardly treat negation as externally static, which is inconsistent with anaphora to doubly-negated indefinites, and Partee disjunctions. This work proposes a general technique for lifting dynamic systems into richer meaning spaces that support dynamic negation, and argues that extant theories of dynamic negation instantiate this technique in diļ¬€erent ways, varying either the substrate dynamic semantics or the enriched meaning space. As case studies, I show how to improve the empirical predictions of Mandelkern's (2022) 'bounded' theory by swapping out the implicit dynamic substrate, and demonstrate how theories of dynamic negation can benefit from an enriched meaning space that supports exceptional scope for indefinites (Charlow 2024).
OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.

Copyright © 2011-2025 Center for Open Science | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Status | API
TOP Guidelines | Reproducibility Project: Psychology | Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology