Loading wiki pages...

Wiki Version:
<p>This hackathon at APS2019 DC aimed to summarize questions, resources, benefits, and challenges when reviewing papers from an open science perspective. For example, should I sign my reviews? What are potential benefits and downsides? Should I ask authors for code and data, and if so, how do I best do that? Is there a catalogue of other questions that I should keep in mind when reviewing </p> <p>We ended up with two products: </p> <p>(1) A general resource list: <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1j5UCaujuro5mUaMvTlACDlCNelRl9hDKCKEVytwRUyo/edit" rel="nofollow">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1j5UCaujuro5mUaMvTlACDlCNelRl9hDKCKEVytwRUyo/edit</a></p> <p>(2) A detailed plan to set up a website to facilitate reviews from an open science perspective: <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GPrXJG3RWK69jRXVUFe3nJMmfWFS0NnSVMDLNeeJF6s/edit#heading=h.19zy8s28lury" rel="nofollow">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GPrXJG3RWK69jRXVUFe3nJMmfWFS0NnSVMDLNeeJF6s/edit#heading=h.19zy8s28lury</a></p>
OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.