Meta-science, interventions, and evaluations

doi:None

Title	Authors

Home

**Project notes** COS generated a grant proposal that was not funded for a randomized trial to evaluate preregistration. [This short proposal][1] could be the basis of a SIPS community project. [1]: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PbuAqfTAXEDr80TbAY804J-qauBeUIA0Csdlt1sEffU/edit This is the survey that Jelte Wicherts and I did about what psychologists would like to see for the future of peer review and etc (e.g., do you trust the literature, what are the major problems with review, what are the best solutions, what open science behaviors are you engaging with?) https://osf.io/zcv7e/ -- Brett

OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.

This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.

Create an Account Learn More Hide this message

Main content

Home

Menu

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Main content

Links to this project

Home

Menu

Add new wiki page

Page permissions have changed

Wiki page deleted

Connected to the collaborative wiki

Connecting to the collaborative wiki

Collaborative wiki is unavailable

Browser unsupported

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.