Main content

Date created: | Last Updated:

: DOI | ARK

Creating DOI. Please wait...

Create DOI

Category: Project

Description: The open-minded cognition (OMC) scale is a new measure of cognitive style (Price, Ottati, Wilson, & Kim, 2015). We identify both limitations to and important omissions in tests of its predictive validity. In five studies, we test two hypotheses derived from the conceptualization of OMC: the OMC outgroup attitude hypothesis and the OMC bias attenuation hypothesis. We find that whereas OMC is associated with less prejudice overall, evidence is mixed that it reduces prejudice towards attitudinally dissimilar groups, a key aspect of the OMC outgroup attitude hypothesis (Studies 1a and 1b). We also find mixed support for the OMC bias attenuation hypothesis: whereas OMC is associated with avoiding selective exposure (Study 3), it did not attenuate political biases across seven separate tests (Studies 2a, 2b, and 3). We recommend further tests of the OMC scale’s predictive validity before its use to assess genuine differences in cognitive style.

Has supplemental materials for Testing the predictive validity of the open-minded cognition scale on PsyArXiv

Files

Loading files...

Citation

Tags

Recent Activity

Loading logs...

OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.