Loading wiki pages...

Wiki Version:
<p><a href="https://osf.io/2cz65/" rel="nofollow">https://osf.io/2cz65/</a> table summary</p> <p>TOP resources: <a href="https://osf.io/kgnva/wiki/home/" rel="nofollow">https://osf.io/kgnva/wiki/home/</a></p> <h3>Logistics ###</h3> <ul> <li>David Mellor, david@cos.io, <a href="https://twitter.com/evomellor" rel="nofollow">@EvoMellor</a></li> <li>Matt Spitzer, matt.spitzer@cos.io, <a href="https://twitter.com/matthewspitzer" rel="nofollow">@matthewspitzer</a></li> <li>Alex DeHaven, alex.dehaven@cos.io</li> <li>Location: Center for Open Science, "Bukas" room</li> <li>Collaborative notes document is <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-tgBwHSXZIc8h33EzFKK0BFMU3RXcC-LJYwM_W5yNBE/edit" rel="nofollow">here</a></li> </ul> <h3>Background</h3> <p>Journals can take specific actions to increase transparency, openness, and reproducibility of the research that they publish including adopting TOP Guidelines, badges for open practices, and Registered Reports. For example, almost 3,000 journals are signatories to the TOP Guidelines, but a small portion have completed review and instituted new policies. This hack-a-thon will accelerate this conversion in psychology by scoring current journal policies for all psychology journals and pursuing an outreach campaign to achieve adoption of transparency policies.</p> <h3>Agenda</h3> <ul> <li><strong>9:00 AM</strong> Overview of TOP Guidelines and current strategy and status</li> <li>See table summary: <a href="https://osf.io/2cz65/" rel="nofollow">https://osf.io/2cz65/</a></li> <li>"Signatories" are committing to evaluate standards for possible adoption.</li> <li>3,000 current "signatories", see <a href="https://cos.io/top" rel="nofollow">cos.io/top</a></li> <li>A few dozen clear cut "implementors" (e.g. <a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.12611/full" rel="nofollow">Ecology Letters</a> or <a href="https://osf.io/kjymq/" rel="nofollow">here</a>)</li> <li>Many others have some relevant policies</li> <li><strong>9:30 AM</strong> Discussion and brainstorming</li> <li>Goal: increase the number of journals implementing 1 or more TOP policy</li> <li><a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-tgBwHSXZIc8h33EzFKK0BFMU3RXcC-LJYwM_W5yNBE/edit" rel="nofollow">Ideas and brainstorming doc</a> </li> <li><strong>10:00 AM</strong> "Scoring" journals based on TOP policies, go to <a href="https://osf.io/b46vx/wiki/Scoring%20instructions" rel="nofollow">Scoring Instructions</a></li> <li>List of target journals (<a href="https://osf.io/3xefk/" rel="nofollow">https://osf.io/3xefk/</a>)</li> <li>Adding more journals</li> <li>Discussing difficult cases</li> <li><strong>11:30 AM</strong> Group discussion on progress, consider next steps</li> <li><strong>12:30</strong> Lunch</li> <li><strong>1:30 PM</strong> Group consensus on next steps</li> <li><strong>2:00 PM</strong> Likely editorial outreach: </li> <li>"This is how your journal relates to the TOP Guidelines"</li> <li>Go to <a href="https://osf.io/b46vx/wiki/Outreach%20instructions" rel="nofollow">Outreach instructions</a></li> <li>Alternatively: This outreach could occur during the scoring</li> <li><strong>4:30 PM</strong> Break</li> </ul>
OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.