Home

Menu

Loading wiki pages...

View
Wiki Version:
The Mandarin sentence final particle *ba* has been described as expressing un- certainty or soliciting agreement in declaratives (‘weakening’ an assertion, Han 1995, Li 2006 a.o.). However, unlike English ‘weakeners’ like final rises or epistemic modals, *ba* in interrogatives appears to ‘strengthen’ a question to a demand: “you must answer this question”. This is sometimes taken to show how discourse particles can modify the default discourse effects of declaratives and interrogatives (Ettinger and Malamud, 2014). Others (Chao 1968 Zhu 1999) postulate a lexical ambiguity: *ba1* in declaratives, which weakens an assertion; *ba2* in interrogatives, which strengthens a question. I discuss new data showing that *ba*-declaratives are not always ‘weak’ and *ba*-interrogatives are not stronger than unmarked interrogatives in the same context, which is not explained by current theories. I propose that, uniformly, *ba* is used to mark its prejacent as contributing to an issue it represents as open, and the correlation with clause types is an epiphenomenon.
OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.