**Citation**
Dial, H., McMurray, B., & Martin, R. (2019). Lexical processing depends on sublexical processing: Evidence from the visual world paradigm and aphasia. *Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 81*, 1047-1064
**Contents of OSF Project**
This OSF project was created to serve as a permanent data repository for the above manuscript. All derived measures used in data analysis are included, as are R scripts that were used for the ANOVA, bootstrapped correlations and binomial linear mixed effects modeling.
**Abstract**
Some early studies of people with aphasia reported strikingly better performance on lexical than sublexical speech perception tasks (e.g., Blumstein et al., 1977a; Miceli, et al., 1980). These findings challenged the claim that lexical processing depends on sublexical processing (e.g., McClelland & Elman, 1986; Norris et al., 2000) and suggested that acoustic information could be mapped directly to lexical representations (e.g., Goldinger, 1998; Pierrehumbert, 2001). However, Dial and Martin (2017) argued that these studies failed to match the discriminability of targets and distractors for the sublexical and lexical stimuli and showed that when using closely matched tasks with natural speech tokens, no patient performed substantially better at the lexical than sublexical processing task. In the current study, we sought to provide converging evidence for the dependence of lexical on sublexical processing by examining the perception of synthetic speech stimuli varied on a voice-onset time continuum using eye-tracking methodology, which is sensitive to online speech perception processes (e.g., McMurray et al., 2008). Eight individuals with aphasia and ten age-matched controls completed two visual world paradigm tasks: phoneme (sublexical) and word (lexical) identification. For both identification and eye movement data, strong correlations were observed between the sublexical and lexical tasks. Critically, no patient within the control range on the lexical task was impaired on the phoneme task. Overall, the current study supports the claim that lexical processing depends on sublexical processing. Implications for inferring deficits in people with aphasia and the use of sublexical tasks to assess sublexical processing are also discussed.
