Date created: | Last Updated:

Category: Project

Description: The project aims to examine the relationship between scholars’ self-reported publication pressure and their self-reported scientific misconduct in research. In Study 1 the participants (N = 423) were scholars representing various disciplines from one big university in Poland. In Study 2 the participants (N = 31) were exclusively members of the management, such as dean, director, etc. from the same university. Three main conclusions are: 1) most scholars are convinced of their morality and predict that they will behave morally in the future; 2) our results attest to the problem of scientific misconduct, particularly minor offenses such as honorary authorship, observed both by researchers themselves (particularly in their colleagues) and by their superiors; 3) researchers experiencing publication pressure report an intention to engage in scientific misconduct in the future, and individuals in managerial positions observing publication pressure in their subordinates also observe their dishonest research practices.