Home

Menu

Loading wiki pages...

View
Wiki Version:
**Original citation:** KD Vohs, JW Schooler (2008). The value of believing in free will: encouraging a belief in determinism increases cheating. Psychological Science, 19.1: 49-54. **Target of replication:** The key analyses in support of this focused on differences in cheating rates between conditions, and on correlations between the manipulation check (the free will scale by Paulhus & Margesson, 1994) and the cheating outcome. ---------- **Summary of differences between RP:P & ML:5:** 1. ***Free-Will Manipulation*** The original study and the RP:P replication used passages from Francis Crick’s The Astonishing Hypothesis which may have been too difficult for participants to understand. We therefore will use the free-will manipulation of Alquist, Ainsworth, and Baumeister (2012), which is based on the same Crick passages, but which may be more convincing to a broader range of participants. 2. ***Free-Will Measurement*** The original study and the RP:P replication used an unpublished scale by Paulhus & Margesson (1994) to measure belief in free will, which turned out to have questionable reliability. More recently, Paulhus & Carey (2011) have further developed and refined the scale, creating a more psychometrically-stable measuring tool, which we will use instead.
OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.