93: Double-blind peer review vs. open science

Daniel Quintana; James Heathers

doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/7ZPME

Title	Authors

Everything Hertz podcast /

93: Double-blind peer review vs. open science

Contributors:

Date created: | Last Updated:

: DOI | ARK

Creating DOI. Please wait...

Create DOI

Category: Communication

Description: Dan and James answer a listener question on how to navigate open science practices, such as preprints and open code repositories, in light of double-blind reviews.

License: CC-By Attribution 4.0 International

Projects
Registrations

Results: All Projects Results: My Projects Results: All Registrations Results: My Registrations

Wiki

Add important information, links, or images here to describe your project.

Files

Loading files...

Citation

Recent Activity

Loading logs...

OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.

This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.

Create an Account Learn More Hide this message

Main content

Links to this project

Everything Hertz podcast /

93: Double-blind peer review vs. open science

Link other OSF projects

Wiki

Files

Citation

Recent Activity

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.