Main content

Date created: | Last Updated:

: DOI | ARK

Creating DOI. Please wait...

Create DOI

Category: Project

Description: Motivation influences goals, decisions, and memory formation. Imperative motivation drives action to address urgent goals, whereas interrogative motivation supports broader learning for future goals. We induced motivational states by manipulating cover stories for a reinforcement learning task: The Imperative group imagined executing an art museum heist, whereas the Interrogative group imagined planning a future heist. Participants repeatedly chose among four “doors” and sampled trial-unique paintings with variable rewards, then returned the next day for a surprise memory test. Relative to the Imperative group, the Interrogative group showed more directed exploration and less exploitation during reinforcement learning. Furthermore, the Interrogative group showed better recognition of paintings and significant reward modulation of memory. Conversely, participants in the Imperative group showed worse memory and no reward modulation. We propose that interrogative and imperative motivational states differentially modulate immediate performance and longer-term learning, bearing implications for education, behavior change, and clinical interventions.

Files

Loading files...

Citation

Recent Activity

Loading logs...

OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.