The authors were contacted on four occasions; twice pre data collection for the purposes of providing study materials and twice post-data collection (detailed below). Contact one (materials): Request for study materials. Images were supplied but not the task programme. Authors requested that these images were used only for study purposes, and were not kept or shared after data collection was complete. Contact two (task parameters): The task was reprogrammed in E-prime. The original manuscript was detailed enough to enable good reconstruction of task. However, a couple of minor details required verification (details of task instructions and screen layouts), which the authors provided in full. Contact three (sensitivity calculations): The authors were contacted to confirm that the sensitivity scores were being calculated correctly. The author provided more information and further references, and also worked through an example in an email. Contact four: There was some confusion regarding the analyses. The data extraction section indicated that four sensitivity scores were calculated (one for each condition: sexual intent, happiness, sadness, rejection), but sections of the results section suggested there were two scores (one for positive affect and one for negative affect). We therefore queried this with the authors and queried how affect was analysed (i.e., as a four level or two level factor), and included analysis syntax in the email. The authors confirmed that our proposed analyses matched their original analyses.