## Detailed program - *14:00h - 14:15h: Welcome by Frederick Verbruggen and Jan De Houwer* - *14:15h - 14:45h: [Tony Ross-Hellauer](https://www.linkedin.com/in/tonyrosshellauer)* - Title: Aligning incentives to overcome the Attitude Behaviour Gap in Open Science - Abstract: Studies consistently show generally positive attitudes amongst researchers to most elements of Open Science. Yet these good thoughts have yet to translate to good practice on a large scale. This talk discusses incentives as a key element in uptake to promote Open Science and overcome this value/action gap. It balances discussion of intrinsic and extrinsic incentives, and critically analyses the direction of current top-down actions to push open practices, including Plan S, FAIR data mandates and DORA. - *14:45h - 15:00h: First 'blitz' session* - David Wisniewski (Psychology, UGent): "Sharing and using code for experimental cognitive/neuro science" - Ian Hussey & Sean Hughes (Psychology, UGent): "Attitudes 2.0: A New Multi-Journal, Registered Report Initiative Incentivizing Open Science Practices in Psychology" - Sally Chambers (Digital Humanities Research Coordinator, UGent): "Open Humanities: a participatory paradigm shift" - *15:00h - 15:30h: [Jon Tennant](http://fossilsandshit.com)* - Title: So you want to be an epic scientist - Abstract: You cannot go anywhere these days without hearing about 'Open Science' in one form or another. Policymakers and funders are now encouraging it, and there is a big movement to align the incentives with the practices of openness. But how does one 'do Open Science' exactly? This talk will discuss some of the key practices, tools, and services that researchers can apply to their own workflows to make it more efficient, transparent, and impactful. This talk will also draw on resources being developed by the Open Science MOOC. - *15:30h - 15:45h: Second 'blitz' session* - Christina Reimer (Psychology, UGent): "How the co-pilot system helps improve the scientific workflow" - Andy Wills (Psychology, Plymouth University): "Open science for computational theories of mind" - Esther De Smet (DOZA, UGent): "Open science as a pathway to societal impact” - *15:45h - 16:15h: coffee break* - *16:15h - 16:45h: [Paola Chiara Masuzzo](https://about.me/pmasuzzo)* - Title: Fears around Open Science and how to face them - Abstract: A lot of discussions are currently happening around Open Science and the adoption of open practices in everyday's research workflows. Along with these debates, fears and concerns have emerged, especially from ECRs, that need to be taken into consideration in the ongoing debate. However, some simple facts can be used to weight these concerns against the benefits of open research practices, therefore helping (young and not) scientists transition towards more open practices. This talk will present key evidences for some of the most common concerns and contested issues around Open Science. Issues addressed include preprints and scooping, the misuse of journal ranking and impact factors, predatory journals and the (putative) cost of open access. - *16:45h - 17:00h: Third 'blitz' session* - Yves Rosseel (Psychology, Ghent University):"The importance of open-source statistical software" - Daniele Marinazzo (Psychology, UGent): "Overlay journals and the need for a sustainable publishing infrastructure" - Inge Van Nieuwerburgh (Central Library, UGent): "Open Access in Belgian legislation" - *17:00h - 18:00h: **Keynote Brian Nosek** * - Title: Shifting incentives from getting it published to getting it right - Abstract: The currency of academic science is publishing. Producing novel, positive, and clean results maximizes the likelihood of publishing success because those are the best kind of results. There are multiple ways to produce such results: (1) be a genius, (2) be lucky, (3) be patient, or (4) employ flexible analytic and selective reporting practices to manufacture beauty. In a competitive marketplace with minimal accountability, it is hard to avoid (4). But, there is a way. With results, beauty is contingent on what is known about their origin. With methodology, if it looks beautiful, it is beautiful. The only way to be rewarded for something other than the results is to make transparent how they were obtained. With openness, I won’t stop aiming for beautiful papers, but when I get them, it will be clear that I earned them. - *18:00h - 19:00h: reception*