Main content
Mischaracterizing replication studies leads to erroneous conclusions
Date created: | Last Updated:
: DOI | ARK
Creating DOI. Please wait...
Category: Project
Description: This piece originally appeared on Retraction Watch: http://retractionwatch.com/2016/03/07/lets-not-mischaracterize-replication-studies-authors/. It is a response to D. Gilbert, King, Pettigrew, and Wilson's (2016) claims that low replication rates in the Reproducibility Project: Psychology were due to differences between the original and replication methodologies. Nosek and E. Gilbert use an example of D. Gilbert's characterizations of a study to suggest that the criticism is misleading at best.