Main content

Home

Menu

Loading wiki pages...

View
Wiki Version:
Hello everyone, thanks for visiting this page! If you have any feedback/questions/etc., I'd love to hear that: you can email me at s.terenghi@uu.nl. ------ [Short abstract, see PDF for full version] Since Anderson & Keenan 1985, two types of (exophoric) demonstrative systems have been described: person-oriented demonstratives systems refer to the speech act partici- pants (speaker ‘*i*’, hearer ‘*u*’) and locate an object/an area in the vicinity of one or neither of them; distance-oriented demonstrative systems, instead, make reference to the relative distance of the referent w.r.t. *i*, by defining (typically: three) degrees of distance: near *i*, at a medial distance from *i*, and far from *i*. The distinction between these systems is only visible in the middle term of ternary demonstrative systems (i.e. systems with three contrastive forms): that term is interpreted as *u*-related in person-oriented systems and as conveying a medial distance from *i* in distance-oriented ones. In this paper, I propose a unified analysis of these systems: I argue that demonstratives are to be construed as person-oriented and that distance contrasts are encoded on top of person oppositions, i.e. derived as modifiers of the person core.
OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.