Home

Menu

Loading wiki pages...

View
Wiki Version:
<p>Understanding the dynamic processes of personality and affect requires repeated assessments. The experience sampling method (ESM; repeated measures across a short period of time) is typically held as the gold standard for such data collection. However, ESM studies are costly, time-intensive, and more likely than survey research to face attrition. Alternatively, the day reconstruction method (DRM; asking participants to detail the events of a previous day) is proposed to provide the same degree of data richness while circumventing the need for repeated measurements. To determine if the methods are indeed providing similar information, the present study of 385 undergraduate students conducted a direct comparison. Reported affect in the two measures was highly correlated (<em>r</em>s = .76 - .89), and there was high overall agreement in reported situations (<em>M</em> = 91%). These findings indicate high similarity between ESM and DRM and support the use of DRM in collecting cross-situation data.</p>
OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.