- Validity IA: Rated Social Desirability of RRFS
- Ratings of social desirability of RRFS items
- Initial Sample: 150 US MTurk Workers, paid .50 (75 total cost)
- Inclusionary Criteria: (estimated n = 68)
- Self-identifies as Christian on A_4 (Option 4 through 14)
- Answers Question A_5 with response “author”
- Answers Question Z_1 with Option 1 (Keep)
- Data Management:
- Missing Values: R_SD_01 to R_SD_12 Missing values
recoded to “3”
- Reverse-code R_SD_02, R_SD_04, R_SD_07, R_SD_09,
R_SD_10, and R_SD_12 (1=5, 2=4, 4=2, 5=1)
- Create RRFS_SD by summing R_SD_01 through R_SD_12
- Hypothesis: The mean score on RRFS_SD
is significantly higher than a score of 36.00
- Planned Analyses:
- Descriptives for Questions A_1 through A_4, R_SD_01 through R_SD_12
- Single-sample t-test to determine whether
Mean R_SD exceeds 36.00; Statistical significance (one-tailed)
expected.
- Additional post hoc analyses. I decided to repeat the analysis for the entire sample.
