Main content

Date created: | Last Updated:

: DOI | ARK

Creating DOI. Please wait...

Create DOI

Category: Project

Description: In the present study, we would like to get more insight into publication bias by examining it at the author, reviewer, and editor level simultaneously. Hence, we will focus on academics who are authors, reviewers, and editors in order to see where exactly and to what extent in the process of generating a scientific paper publication bias occurs. Additionally, we would like to make a direct comparison between publication bias induced by authors, reviewers, and editors. We will explicitly focus on whether statistically significant findings have a greater likelihood of being published than statistically non-significant findings. This all gives rise to the following research question: To what extent do authors, reviewers, and editors contribute to publication bias in scientific literature?

License: CC-By Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International

Has supplemental materials for The role of results in deciding to publish on MetaArXiv

Files

Loading files...

Citation

Tags

Recent Activity

Loading logs...

OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.