Main content

Home

Menu

Loading wiki pages...

View
Wiki Version:
Food Intake and Selection Following Physical Relocation: A scoping review Codebook Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry University of Alberta August 10, 2022   Procedures for Coding Research Questions 1. What studies have been done on food selection and food intake following physical relocation? 2. How does physical relocation effect food selection and food intake? a. How does physical relocation effect healthy eating outcomes (defined by fruit and vegetable intake)? b. What is known about the facilitators and barriers to healthy eating (defined by fruit and vegetable intake) following physical relocation? Inclusion Criteria 1. Physical relocation has occurred (either prospectively or retrospectively). 2. Self-reported or objective assessment of neighbourhood physical environment before and after relocation. 3. Included a measure of food selection or food intake as an outcome. 4. Written in English. Procedures 1. Cases (i.e., findings within a study) must be independent of one another. In other words, every finding within a study must be distinguishable from each other by at least one category in the study features (e.g., gender). 2. While coding, keep note of any unusual decisions. This will be important when comparing with each other for reliability. Characteristics of the Document 1. Author (last name of first author) 2. Year 3. Origin 4. Publication type 1. Journal article 2. Report 3. Grey literature Characteristics of the Studies 5. Design 1. Cross-sectional (e.g., surveys) 2. Prospective or follow-up (e.g., behavior assessed over time) 3. Simulation modelling or scenarios 4. Interviews (qualitative) 5. Review (systematic) 6. Experimental 7. Other 6. Aim/objectives of the intervention 1. Food intake 2. Food selection 3. Food diversity 4. Food cost 5. Calories/macronutrients 6. Micronutrients 7. Other 7. Intervention methods 1. Questionnaire 2. Food diary 3. Interview 4. Other Characteristics of the Sample (who are the participants?) 8. Sample size: 9. Age of participants (mean/median yrs.): 10. Gender of participants: 1. Male 2. Female 3. Mixed 4. N/A 11. Highest level of education achieved: 1. No schooling completed 2. Nursery school to 8th grade 3. Some high school, no diploma 4. High school graduate, diploma or the equivalent 5. Trade/technical/vocational training 6. Associate degree 7. Bachelor’s degree 8. Master’s degree 9. Doctorate degree 12. Approximate annual income: 1. $0 - $24,999 2. $25,000 - $49,999 3. $50,000 - $74,999 4. $75,000 - $99,999 5. $100,000 - $124,999 6. $125,000 - $149,999 7. $150,000 and up Characteristics of Food Intake 13. Intrapersonal (individual) level 1. Preferences/perceptions 2. Knowledge/skills 3. Health status 4. Motivation 5. Self-confidence 14. Interpersonal level 1. Food availability (home) 2. Social support 3. Time constraints 4. Culture 5. Screen time 15. Community/institution level 1. Food availability (stores) 2. School/workplace food environment 3. Eating out 4. Built environment 5. Access 16. Policy level 1. Media/advertising 2. Public policy 3. Development/zoning regulations 4. Food pricing Characteristics of Food Selection 17. Biological determinants 1. Hunger 2. Appetite 3. Taste 18. Economic determinants 1. Cost 2. Income 3. Availability 19. Physical determinants 1. Access 2. Education 3. Skills (e.g. cooking) 4. Time 20. Social determinants 1. Culture 2. Family 3. Peers 4. Meal patterns 21. Psychological determinants 1. Mood 2. Stress 3. Guilt Purpose and Findings 22. Main aim or purpose (record the main aim or purpose of the study) 33. Finding (record the main finding related to the particular case)
OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.