Main content

Date created: | Last Updated:

: DOI | ARK

Creating DOI. Please wait...

Create DOI

Category: Data

Description: Provides the research data and analysis codes for Gächter, Kölle & Quercia, Preferences and Perceptions in Provision and Maintenance Public Goods, Games and Economic Behavior 135, September 2022, 338-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2022.06.009 ABSTRACT: We study two generic versions of public goods problems: in Provision problems, the public good does not exist initially and needs to be provided; in Maintenance problems, the public good already exists and needs to be maintained. In four lab and online experiments (2,105), we document a robust asymmetry in preferences and perceptions in two incentive-equivalent versions of these public good problems. We find fewer conditional cooperators and more free riders in Maintenance than Provision, a difference that is replicable, stable, and reflected in perceptions of kindness. Incentivized control questions administered before gameplay reveal dilemma-specific misperceptions but controlling for them neither eliminates game-dependent conditional cooperation, nor differences in perceived kindness of others' cooperation. Thus, even when sharing the same game form, Maintenance and Provision are different social dilemmas that require separate behavioral analyses.

License: CC-By Attribution 4.0 International

Wiki

Data and analysis codes for Gächter, Kölle & Quercia, Preferences and Perceptions in Provision and Maintenance Public Goods, Games and Economic Behavior 135, September 2022, 338-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2022.06.009

All methods used to generate these data are described in the paper and its supplementary materials.

This work was supported by the European Research Council [grant numbers ERC…

Files

Files can now be accessed and managed under the Files tab.

Citation

Tags

conditional cooperationERC-AdG 101020453 PRINCIPLESexperimentsguilt aversionkindnessmaintenance and provision social dilemmasmisperceptionsrevealed altruism

Recent Activity

Unable to retrieve logs at this time. Please refresh the page or contact support@osf.io if the problem persists.

OSF does not support the use of Internet Explorer. For optimal performance, please switch to another browser.
Accept
This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.