Date created: | Last Updated:

: DOI | ARK

Creating DOI. Please wait...

Create DOI

Category: Project

Description: Carlsson, Schimmack, Williams, and Bürkner criticize our analysis (Scheibehenne, Jamil, & Wagenmakers, 2016) because it collapses data across different studies. In addition, CSWB apply a random-effect model and argue that allegedly minor changes in the parameter priors render the evidence inconclusive. Here we address both issues.

License: CC0 1.0 Universal

This project represents an accepted preprint submitted to BITSS . Learn more about how to work with preprint files. View preprint

Files

Loading files...

Citation

Recent Activity

Loading logs...

This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept
×

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.

Create an Account Learn More Hide this message