Date created: | Last Updated:


Creating DOI. Please wait...

Create DOI

Category: Project

Description: Carlsson, Schimmack, Williams, and Bürkner criticize our analysis (Scheibehenne, Jamil, & Wagenmakers, 2016) because it collapses data across different studies. In addition, CSWB apply a random-effect model and argue that allegedly minor changes in the parameter priors render the evidence inconclusive. Here we address both issues.

License: CC0 1.0 Universal

This project represents an accepted preprint submitted to BITSS . Learn more about how to work with preprint files. View preprint


Loading files...


Recent Activity

Loading logs...

This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.

Start managing your projects on the OSF today.

Free and easy to use, the Open Science Framework supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery.

Create an Account Learn More Hide this message